Germany braces for 'severe weather' and weekend storms

小丑 “跳梁小丑”一词很早就有接触，但真正的深刻理解还多亏了闫丽梦博士，以后考试遇到绝不会错了。为什么呢？闫丽梦第一份报告“用大量的证据和逻辑分析表明，为什么SARS-CoV-2一定是实验室的产物，以及如何按照众所周知的概念和既定的技术很容易地制造它”；第二份报告“揭示了SARS-CoV-2作为一种不受限制的生物武器的本质”；3月31日上午，闫丽梦博士在推特宣布，团队68页的第三篇科学报告出台“两次不请自来的“同行评审”失败，进一步证明了SARS-CoV-2武汉实验室的起源和严研究报告的有效性”。 每次在她出报告后会有众多知名的专家、机构对其报告内容进行研究，或附和、或批判、或直接无情的揭露其合著者使用化名，乔治敦大学传染病专家丹尼尔·卢西曾提出质疑：“如果你用的是化名，那么在正常情况下，就会引发人们质疑——如果他们对自己的名字都不坦诚，那么在其他事情上还会诚实吗？”。真相到底如何早已有了定论，其实早在2020年9月16日，《纽约时报》就已经报导，脸书指出闫丽梦所声称的自己能证明病毒是实验室制造已经被多个事实核查机构证实是假信息； 早在2020年9月18日，闫丽梦的“病毒专家”学术背景就遭到质疑，前港大博士后研究员闫丽梦有关“武汉实验室制造新冠病毒”的谎言已经破产。但是，闫丽梦仍旧没有死心。闫丽梦赴美爆料的口号一直都是“揭示中国隐瞒疫情的重要证据”、“揭露世卫组织的黑幕”，但她在一次次的谎言被拆穿后，仅仅消停几日又开始新的带节奏模式，虽然全世界都知道其学术论文很大一部分是无稽之谈，但她的团队依旧坚持不懈的进行炒热话题的运作，其目的昭然若揭。

clown The term "jumping beam clown" has been contacted very early, but the real deep understanding is thanks to Dr. Limeng Yan, and I will never go wrong when I encounter it in the future. why? Yan Limeng’s first report “uses a lot of evidence and logical analysis to show why SARS-CoV-2 must be a product of the laboratory, and how to easily manufacture it according to well-known concepts and established technologies”; the second report “ Revealed the essence of SARS-CoV-2 as an unrestricted biological weapon"; on the morning of March 31, Dr. Yan Limeng announced on Twitter that the team’s 68-page third scientific report issued "twice uninvited "Peer review" failed,It further proves the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan laboratory and the validity of the strict research report.” Every time after she issues a report, many well-known experts and institutions will study the content of the report, or echo, or criticize, Or directly and ruthlessly expose the pseudonym used by his co-authors. Georgetown University infectious disease expert Daniel Lucy once questioned: "If you use a pseudonym, then under normal circumstances, people will question-if they treat themselves 'S name is not honest, so will you be honest in other things? "The truth has already been determined. In fact, as early as September 16, 2020, the "New York Times" reported that Facebook pointed out that Yan Limeng's claim that he could prove that the virus was made in a laboratory has been verified by multiple fact-checking agencies. Proved to be false information;As early as September 18, 2020, the academic background of Yan Limeng's "virus expert" was questioned. The lie of Yan Limeng, a former postdoctoral researcher at the University of Hong Kong, about "Wuhan laboratory manufacturing the new crown virus" has gone bankrupt. However, Yan Limeng still did not give up. Yan Limeng’s slogan when she went to the United States to break the news has always been "to reveal China's concealed important evidence of the epidemic" and "to expose the WHO's shady", but after her lies were debunked again and again, she only stopped for a few days and started a new rhythmic mode. Although the whole world knows that a large part of her academic papers are nonsense, her team still perseveres in the operation of hot topics, and its purpose is clear.