For members


Merkel vs German states: Who really holds the power to fight the pandemic?

Just as a deadly third wave of Covid-19 hits Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel is embroiled in an untimely battle with some state leaders over how to tackle the pandemic. Aaron Burnett looks at who really holds the power in the fight to return to normal life in Germany.

Merkel vs German states: Who really holds the power to fight the pandemic?
Chancellor Angela Merkel in the Bundestag on March 24th. Photo: DPA

Against a sluggish vaccine rollout, rising coronavirus cases, and a plethora of different opinions and rules across Germany’s 16 federal states, Chancellor Merkel made several unusual moves during an appearance on Anne Will, a popular night talk show, on Sunday. 

First, she criticized the leader of her own Christian Democrat party and the man looking to succeed her – Armin Laschet  – for favouring a plan that uses extensive mandatory testing to keep shops and galleries open, even with rising case numbers. 

“But he’s not the only one,” Merkel told Will, alluding to the other regional politicians who are going their own way.

In a second unusual move, she floated the idea of overruling state leaders to impose restrictions that would apply across the country to try and break another wave of infections. Laschet and other state leaders have protested, calling for “more freedom and flexibility” for handling the pandemic regionally.

READ ALSO: German health experts call for strict lockdown to quell rising Covid cases

Indeed, states like North-Rhine Westphalia, Saarland, and Berlin have sought to use testing to keep shops and facilities open, right after agreeing to an “emergency brake” with the federal government.

That brake should see strict shutdowns and curfews for areas with more than 100 new infections per 100,000 people over seven days.

So if states have agreed to a nationwide line, why are they then allowed to do their own thing?

Under Germany’s Infection Protection Law, the 16 states have leeway to set their own rules in a host of areas, which only has to be based on national guidance.

That’s why some states have evening curfews and others don’t, why some states require 10 days of quarantine for travellers returning from abroad and others 14 days, and why gyms reopened last year in some states before others.

READ ALSO: How the German city of Tübingen is betting on Covid tests to reopen public life

So what power do German states have?

German federalism has a history dating all the way back to the Holy Roman Empire.

It took on a new importance after WWII because of how it resulted in powers divided between the 16 states, preventing too much authority from gathering centrally in a country reckoning with its recent Nazi past.

The system is similar to that in the US, for example, where states hold significant political power. Each German state has, for example, its own police force, education system, courts and health system.

Essentially there are 17 governments – in the 16 states and at the federal level.

Meanwhile, article 70 of Germany’s constitution says that lawmaking is in the regions’ power unless stated otherwise in the Basic Law (Grundgesetz).

READ ALSO: German politics – 10 things you need to know

During the pandemic, however, a federal patchwork of laws has often left German residents confused as to which restrictions apply to whom, where, and when. 

It’s also led to moments of public frustration between Merkel and state leaders.

As we reported back in spring 2020, Merkel complained about “opening discussion orgies” (the fantastic German word is Öffnungsdiskussionsorgien) among state leaders who she felt were reopening too quickly after the lockdown.

And throughout the second wave, Merkel has favoured putting in strict lockdown policies early to arrest emerging infection waves.

German state leaders, however, have often pushed back during their regular Covid crisis meetings with the Chancellor – which often end with Merkel announcing compromises she doesn’t think go far enough – at very late night press conferences.

Last week Merkel and state premiers announced a stricter lockdown over the Easter weekend – but Merkel dramatically backtracked on it just two days later, apologising for the move.

CDU leader and North Rhine-Westphalia leader Armin Laschet talking to Merkel in a video meeting. Photo: DPA

All of this points to a system that doesn’t seem to be working properly.

In the meantime, the country’s incidence rate has doubled in a month and public health experts advising Merkel say only a strict lockdown can break the third wave. “We can’t keep going on like this,” said Merkel during Sunday’s interview.

Will Merkel take action?

So what can – or might – Merkel do? The Chancellor has consulted legal counsel and could amend the current law to take over certain pandemic control powers from the states, allowing her to pass the same set of strict restrictions across the country.

For that, she’d have to get approval from her Cabinet and the Bundestag, while consulting with the Bundesrat – which represents the same state leaders she’d be overruling.

Dr Ursula Münch, Director of the Academy for Political Education in Tutzing, said the Bundesrat wouldn’t have an absolute veto on this though.

She also says having Merkel overrule them might give state leaders a bit of political cover, which could work in their favour.

“They would be insulted,” Münch told The Local. “But it comes with perhaps a big advantage of not having to deal with the same amount of local pressure from trade associations to relax restrictions. […] State leaders could just blame the federal government.”

READ ALSO: Is Germany heading for a tougher lockdown?

Münch adds that Germany’s Infection Protection Law is from the year 2000, and was designed to respect state powers, not necessarily to deal with nationwide crisis. “We wonder about it today, but no one thought about the possibility of a pandemic at the time,” she said.

Merkel would have at least one high-profile state leader on her side if she did decide to take over pandemic powers.

“If Chancellor Merkel wants to take more initiative at the national level to change the rules and set out clear guidelines, she has my full support,” Bavarian premier Markus Söder, who is a contender as future chancellor in Germany, told broadcaster ARD.

For now, Merkel says she hasn’t yet decided whether she will take that step, but that state leaders will have to take tough action very soon to avoid it. Will they toe the line?

Aaron Burnett is a German-Canadian journalist specialising in international security, as well as European and Canadian politics.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.


EU ministers urge unity after Germany’s energy ‘bazooka’

EU finance ministers on Monday pleaded for unity after Germany announced a €200 billion plan to help German households and businesses pay for high energy prices, amid accusations that the EU's biggest economy was acting alone.

EU ministers urge unity after Germany's energy 'bazooka'

Europe is struggling with historically high energy prices as it faces an early autumn cold snap and a coming winter almost certainly to be endured without crucial Russian gas supplies because of the war in Ukraine.

Many EU countries have announced national programmes to shield consumers from the high prices. But Germany went the furthest on Friday when it announced its mammoth plan, which will see help pouring to Germans for two years.

Arriving to talk with his eurozone counterparts, German Finance Minister Christian Lindner insisted the spending was “proportionate” to the size of Germany’s economy and said his goal was to use as little of the money as possible.

READ ALSO: Germany to spend €200 billion to cap soaring energy costs

But Germany’s largesse rankled several EU capitals, some of which feared their industries could take severe blows while Germany’s sits protected, deforming the EU’s single market.

Outgoing Italian prime minister Mario Draghi has slammed Berlin for its lack of solidarity and coordination with EU partners.

French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire, without directly criticizing Berlin, called on partners to agree a common strategy against the price shock and for countries to refrain from going it alone.

“The more this strategy is coordinated, united, the better it is for all of us,” he said.

Risk to ‘European unity’

Others pointed to the unprecedented solidarity shown in the Covid-19 crisis in which the 27 EU nations, against all expectations, approved a jointly financed €750 billion recovery plan.

“Solidarity is not only on the German shoulders, I think this is something that we have to deliver at European level,” said EU economics affairs commissioner Paolo Gentiloni.

“We have very good examples from the previous crisis on how solidarity can react to a crisis and also reassure financial markets. I think that this is our goal,” he said.

While a Covid-style recovery plan is not in the cards for now, Le Maire said €200 billion in loans and €20 billion in aid should be devoted to REPowerEU, a programme to help countries break their dependence on Russian gas.

READ ALSO: Will Germany set a gas price cap – and how would it work?

Bruegel, a highly influential think tank in Brussels, called the German plan a spending “bazooka” that many EU countries were unable to match, creating a potential source of animosity.

“If the German gas price brake gives German business a much better chance to survive the crisis than, say, Italian business, economic divergences in the EU could be deepened, and European unity on Russia undermined,” it said in a blog.