Advertisement

Sources say German officer violated protocol in deadly air strike

AFP
AFP - [email protected]
Sources say German officer violated protocol in deadly air strike
Soldiers investigate after the deadly air strike. Photo: DPA

NATO officials have accused a German officer of giving false information to the alliance when he ordered a deadly air strike in Afghanistan, daily Financial Times Deutschland said Friday.

Advertisement

The NATO sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity according to the newspaper, said Colonel Georg Klein told alliance partners that German soldiers were in direct contact with the enemy when he called for the bombing which killed several civilians in Kunduz province on September 4.

The officials said no units from the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) were in the vicinity of two coalition fuel trucks that had been captured by Taliban militants, the target of the strike, it said.

This would effectively rule out direct contact.

When asked by ISAF command via radio what kind of contact the troops had with enemy forces, Klein responded "visual contact," the sources told the newspaper.

To order an air strike without confirmation from ISAF headquarters, officers must affirm that their soldiers are in direct contact with the enemy, according to NATO rules cited in the report.

NATO and the German defence ministry declined to comment on any possible violation of procedure.

An Afghan government report this week described the September 4 strike as a mistake and said it had killed 99 people including 30 civilians.

NATO has not completed its probe of the bombing but has acknowledged that civilians were among the dead.

In response to allies' criticism of the strike, Germany has asked other governments not to comment until the investigation is complete.

More

Join the conversation in our comments section below. Share your own views and experience and if you have a question or suggestion for our journalists then email us at [email protected].
Please keep comments civil, constructive and on topic – and make sure to read our terms of use before getting involved.

Please log in to leave a comment.

See Also