Published: 20 Dec 11 07:17 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.de/sci-tech/20111220-39611.html
A research organization is growing human skin in the hope of using it to trial cosmetics and medicines, reducing the need for animal testing. The synthetic skin is made using cells from infant foreskins.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Germany is the most popular country in the world, according to a poll released on Tuesday asking people to rate the positive and negative influence of 16 major nations. READ () »
The German language has some rather colourful terms for describing parts of the human body. Turn to The Local List this week for a few anatomical alternatives. READ () »
Healthy dogs have wet noses, but cold and creamy canine noses may be a sign that they've been treated to a doggy frozen yoghurt made in Berlin. Rather than chocolate or pistachio, flavours include salmon and beef. READ () »
A hamstring injury has ruled Borussia Dortmund's Germany midfield star Mario Götze out of Saturday's Champions League final at Wembley against Bayern Munich – the club he will join next month after activating a release clause in his contract. READ () »
Germany's Social Democrats marked their 150 anniversary by opening a new chapter in global centre-left politics, founding an alliance of parties in an attempt to replace the ignored and discredited Socialist International. READ () »
The small population of grey seals on the Baltic Sea has increased significantly, with hopes rising that they may start breeding soon, conservationists reported on Wednesday. READ () »
German state prosecutors filed on Wednesday charges against a policeman who punched a woman in the face, breaking her nose and eye socket while she was at a Munich police station in January. READ () »
Police on Wednesday carried out raids across several German states at more than 20 properties, which they believe are connected to a network of leftist extremists responsible for carrying out attacks over more than a decade. READ () »
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Sweden at thelocal.se
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
See all ads | Join the Marketplace
931 jobs available
683 new jobs this week
105 new jobs today
Dating
Looking for your own blonde bombshell? Or is the strong, silent type more your
style? Find a German sweetheart here.
Weather
"After clouds comes clear weather," say the Germans. But what about after that? Find out in The Local's weather
section.
Blog
German stuff that's distracting us today.
Noticeboard
Whether you want to buy, sell, hire, announce or promote something, here's the place to do it - completely free of
charge.
Discuss
Debate the news, ask for advice, make friends - or just let off steam.
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Your comments about this article:
>And I have a million!
what, foreskins?? where'd you get all them foreskins? are you a rabbi? :-D
Italian actually.
Photos of woman's cleavage (see the preceeding article) or David's penis prevent persons (at least where I work) from viewing The Local since the photos are generally not considered appropriate in an office setting.
Keep showing photos like this (like the idiots at The Local France who kept showing a photo of a man grabbing his private parts through his speedo swimsuit) and you may lose readers. I know I will be obliged to stop reading.
And, I have enough of a private life that I am not going to read The Local from home.
However, who could expect a dumb-ass to get the content??????
Just sayin.......
Nothing like a bit of censorship, however some of us are not at work .
Strange but true when I am at work ,I work don't sit around and look at the internet.
Ironically, using animal foreskin would be deemed inhumane in most jursidictions.
Association of Research-based Pharmaceutical Companies (VFA) is for this, Never would doubt that, it is a multi billion dollar industry based on profit and loss.
When I moved to the states from Germany as a ten year old I noticed in the gym that I was the only kid who still had his, thanks Mom, and thanks German culture for not removing part of my body and keeping sensitivity where it belongs.
and which newborn to four year old are signing the release form to use part of there penis for research??
Leaving work now, to take my son to the Library. Just preparing him for a lifetime dearth of private life. Tonight we tour the foreskin and breast implant aisle (publicly funded, at that).
Hopefully this practice will be outlawed completely soon as it is mutilation of a non-consenting child, and nothing else. Sweden already outlawed this primitive 'religious' custom.
Jews and Muslims and large percentage of US children are circumcised and I don't think MEN would have continued the practice if it somehow reduces their sensitiveness ....and it is definitely more hygienic.
In fact, AIDS rates in some US Cities rival hotspots in Africa. In some parts of the U.S., they're actually higher than those in sub-Saharan Africa. According to a 2010 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, rates of HIV among adults in Washington, D.C. exceed 1 in 30; rates higher than those reported in Ethiopia, Nigeria or Rwanda.
The Washington D.C. district report on HIV and AIDS reported an increase of 22% from 2006 in 2009. According to Shannon L. Hader, HIV/AIDS Administration, Washington D.C., March 15, 2009 "[Washington D.C.'s] rates are higher than West Africa... they're on par with Uganda and some parts of Kenya." Hader once led the Federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's work in Zimbabwe.
According to Malaysian AIDS Council vice-president Datuk Zaman Khan, more than 70% of the 87,710 HIV/AIDS sufferers in the country are Muslims. In Malaysia, most, if not all Muslim men are circumcised, whereas circumcision is uncommon in the non-Muslim community. 60% of the Malaysian population is Muslim, which means that HIV is spreading in the community where most men are circumcised at an even faster rate, than in the community where most men are intact.
In the Philippines, the majority of the male population is circumcised, as it is seen as an important rite of passage. In the 2010 Global AIDS report released by UNAIDS in late November, the Philippines was one of seven nations in the world which reported over 25 percent in new HIV infections between 2001 and 2009, whereas other countries have either stabilized or shown significant declines in the rate of new infections. Among all countries in Asia, only the Philippines and Bangladesh are reporting increases in HIV cases, with others either stable or decreasing.
Can you tell us what the HIV scenario looks like in Israel? I'm afraid it doesn't look to pretty.
You know what's more hygienic? A shower.
There are more effective, less invasive ways to prevent disease. That's why the rest of the civilized world doesn't circumcise their children, and German "researchers" depend on countries that do.
Yeah, this is pretty disgusting. Joe hit it on the nail. I'm supposed to feel good for the animals because they're using the foreskins of healthy, non-consenting children instead?
He touches on an interesting point.
During the Holocaust, the Germans experimented on the Jews they held captive. It sounds like some really deranged people even made lampshades made from human skin. Maybe it wouldn't have been so bad if they used this synthetic skin made from baby foreskins instead?
What if instead of baby foreskins, they were using baby labia? You know, since baby girls are being circumcised anyway? Can't let all that precious baby flesh go to waste! If the WHO, UNAIDS etc. play their cards right, they might be able to tap into baby girl clitorises and labia in Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei etc. All they gotta do is pay the right "researchers" to write the literature for them.
This is absolutely despicable. Shame on the Germans.
WHO based its recommendation on scientific study where, I am presuming, all conditions (promiscuity, drogue use, sexual orientation... ) were controlled... on the other hand you are making broad conclusions based on uncorrelated data .... was there a counter study that showed no benefits under scientific conditions? and is there a scientific study showing that there is a lack of sensitivity for circumcised men?
in the US, HIV is largely a gay and Black community problem where promiscuity and non-circumcision (in the Black community) is the biggest.
Is there a reason why the magical 60% figure isn't manifest outside "scientific conditions?" Is there a reason why, in the examples given above, there seems to be no difference, if not a tendency in the opposite direction?
AIDS cases in Malaysia, the Philippines and Bangladesh can't all be uncircumcised black homosexuals can they?
According to UNAIDS, HIV transmission was found to be prevalent among the circumcised in 10 out of 18 countries. Why is this?
Why don't HIV/circumcision rates in the rest of the world, correlate with the "research" in Africa?
The fact remains that HIV transmission is lower in various countries in Europe and Asia, where the men aren't circumcised, than in America, and other countries, where circumcision is near universal. This demonstrates that, even if the "studies" were 100% accurate, circumcision is not absolutely necessary to achieve a reduction in HIV transmission. There are other ways to bring down HIV transmission that don't involve surgery, and "researchers" need to be focusing on THOSE, because let's face it, not everyone's going to go get circumcised.
The Sorrells study physically demonstrates how circumcision removes the most sensitive part of the penis. You might mention other "studies" that showed there was "little to no difference," and even some that show "an increase in sensation." None of them, however, have been as extensive as the Sorrells study, which maps sensitivity on various points on the penis, and takes into account the foreskin. Some "studies" are actually nothing but rigged surveys conducted by none other than the very "researchers" who are trying to "prove" that circumcision "reduces HIV transmission."
But let's not digress.
Whether circumcision prevents HIV or not, whether it decreases sensation or makes you superman in bed has no bearing on the ethical repugnancy of Germans are conducting "studies" on foreskins harvested from healthy, non-consenting children.
As a sufferer from the loss of 20,000 nerve endings, intercourse gradually became less satisfying, and now I find it impossible to orgasm during intercourse, and difficult with masturbation. If only the family doctor had been one of those "anti-circers" But he wasn't, and his ignorance has ruined my sexlife. Please leave your baby boy as nature intended, he can get it done when he is adult if he wants to, though he won't if he has any knowledge of his penis.
about the non-consenting children.
I don't think foreskins were removed for the sole purpose of the study. those boys were going to be circumcised anyway and as alwys in these situations (were no HARD evidence shows a substantial harm is done) the decision belongs to the parents .
beets the hell of sending them to religious schools if you ask me !
You don't remove body parts from anyone else, especially your own kids, without an immediate medical reason. What other parts are all right to remove on a whim? Would it be ok to remove outer ears unless it was proven to harm hearing?
Religious indoctrination is often undone as one matures. Physical amendments are permanent.
What a load of caricatures. Please identify someone who opposes male cutting but not female cutting. No one has any right, even on your almighty religious grounds, to do body alterations without consent. That's something minors can't give. If even a tattoo is illegal how can it be otherwise?
You'll hear Africans tout all the benefits of female mutilation as to health and hygiene, that YOU have swallowed regarding male mutilation. And it's all mutilation in the literal, dictionary sense:
"Disfigurement; a major reduction or alteration of a limb or tissue, which may be intentional or accidental." (McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Modern Medicine 2002)
Your own political correctness comes from a variety of the religious right. Just as orthodox as the one from the political left.
Have a Merry Christmas!
And for the record, I look and feel great!
And my (non religious) cousins had to be done for medical reasons - phimosis is where the foreskin can't be contracted back over the penis and in extreme cases can even stop a child from peeing freely. It's painful and requires surgical correction, removing the foreskin.
So at least with these medical cases, there could be some donations.
Unfortunately, I doubt that many of our more religious circumcisions would also result in willingly donated "unclean" bits for science, whether it was medical or not.