Published: 23 Oct 12 11:21 CET | Print version
Updated: 23 Oct 12 13:55 CET
Online: http://www.thelocal.de/politics/20121023-45727.html
Britain’s Foreign Secretary William Hague accused Germany of alienating many from European ideas by pushing too hard for too much integration. “Sometimes less is more,” he said at a policy forum in Berlin.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Eurovision Song Contest favourite Denmark won the competition on Saturday night, while Germany plunged to 21st place – the worst showing in five years – amidst speculation that it was payback for Angela Merkel’s hated policies. READ () »
The Federal Criminal Police Office is warning of a new type of Islamist terrorist threat from the air that could attack both passenger and cargo planes as well as airport facilities, the Welt am Sonntag newspaper reported. READ () »
European Union proposals to eliminate one and two cent euro coins is annoying some Germans, including a few at the Bundesbank, while others think an EU idea to introduce one and two-euro notes is a good one. READ () »
A 15-year-old boy died on Saturday at the popular “Tropical Islands” swimming and entertainment centre outside of Berlin, the Bild newspaper reported. READ () »
As the musical world lavishly celebrates Richard Wagner's bicentenary, the composer's great-grandson insists he is no spoilsport by denouncing the German master as a narcissist, woman-hater and an anti-Semite. READ () »
If Saturday’s play was any barometer of what may happen at the Champions League final this coming Saturday, then Borussia Dortmund should be very nervous indeed. READ () »
Although less than 50 percent of Germans are optimistic about their current situation, more than half think their future will be better and the number of pessimists in the country dropped, a survey released on Saturday showed. READ () »
Organic food and health stores are undergoing a hefty expansion in Germany, with the Vitalia chain taking over several locations from the bankrupt Schlecker drugstore chain in Munich alone. READ () »
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Sweden at thelocal.se
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
See all ads | Join the Marketplace
785 jobs available
604 new jobs this week
28 new jobs today
Dating
Looking for your own blonde bombshell? Or is the strong, silent type more your
style? Find a German sweetheart here.
Weather
"After clouds comes clear weather," say the Germans. But what about after that? Find out in The Local's weather
section.
Blog
German stuff that's distracting us today.
Noticeboard
Whether you want to buy, sell, hire, announce or promote something, here's the place to do it - completely free of
charge.
Discuss
Debate the news, ask for advice, make friends - or just let off steam.
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Your comments about this article:
"People feel that the EU is a one-way process, a great machine that sucks up decision-making from national parliaments to the European level until everything is decided at that level."
People will continue to feel that while they keep getting told that is so by their politicians. If unhappy with they way something is going, a real leader's approach would include: participating in the rule making process instead of sending the Farage Marauders; negotiating better mechanisms instead of blindly vetoing anything that doesn't give you an immediate advantage over everybody else; and, openly supporting the initiatives that you do agree with instead of rubbishing everything that is not-invented-here.
Hague's point is the German idea about the EU is to consolidate more and more power in a Brussels super state at the expense of nation states.
When Westerwelle speaks of "developing" the EU what he really means is ramping up EU powers and spending.
The citizens of most EU states often agree with the British, look at the French and Dutch referendums, those votes were all about sovrienety, it is not that the French and Dutch favor more integration, it is that their people are ignored by the elites.
Hollande last week even proclaimed he wanted to avoid any more referendums,"because we may not get the desired result"
Who on Earth are "we" I wonder? The elites or the people?
The EU is probably the world's biggest experiment. Pull it off and we get one of the world's greatest achievements - a continental restructuring with enormous benefits and not one drop of blood spilled. However, it isn't a surprise that not all goes according to plan. Democratic accountability? Speed and depth of integration? Issues that must be centralized vs. those that can be devolved? Not only haven't people got the right answer, it isn't even clear if there is a right answer.
So, what do you do when you represent a participant country in such an experiment?
Well Westerwelle has his ideas and he is taking them to the big table and arguing for them. Sounds positive. The Dutch, Irish and others do the same. This is not the British approach which was best summed up by Cameron last year, paraphrased: "we take an enormous amount out of Europe; if Europe sneezes, we catch a cold; but, help - not likely sunshine."
The EU has problems and, given its ambition, this isn't surprising. The alternatives are to fix the problems together or scrap the entire concept and lose all benefits. I think people will be far more upset about the EU if it goes away.
1) It doesn't make sense to share the currency without more centralized economic coordination.
2) Clearly the British don't believe in shared currency (hence, the Pound)
3) This is an easy decision. Living with the decision is hard.
4) Go either way, but you must make a decision and go.
Germany and England both have valid paths-forward for the EU. England is simply not in the EU for the currency. I don't ever know why the EU let financials gravitate to an EU-member that has so insulated their home country, though.
I think what the British government and many millions of citizens in other countries are expressing is that there is a brick wall in Brussels and among elites in most core states when it comes to democratic accountability. There is only ever one choice presented, more power to Brussels, more shared soveirenity, and never any devolution whatsoever.
When the citizens are given a right to vote by referendum, it is crystal clear they support a common market in goods and services and not much more. The referendum results are simply ignored if they are in big countries, in small countries they are forced to re-run the referendums, and with huge pressure and veiled threats, they come around motivated by fear rather than conviction.
Why when greater intergration is passed is it never subject to a re-vote? The French voted for Maastricht by a tiny fraction, why not a re-vote on that? Of course Brussels would never allow that.....
Until the population of the UK is given the facts (like actually having a legal right to holidays is as a result of being in the EU) then the debate will continually be heading for the door marked Exit. We will of course demand free entry to the EU market because we want something for nothing.
First , we all need to be on the same page.
and next we need to be able to enforce the regulations in all member countries.
That is not the case here in the EU.
Either we give up sovereignty and give all power to a Central governing body made up by EU members or we give up the currency and the idea of Unity.
It is not as clear cut as you state.
Firstly, the Brussels agenda is set by country representatives. If devolution is not on the agenda, it is because your elective representative didn't put it there.
Secondly, all the referenda have shown is support or otherwise for the local government at the time the referendum was taken. Which is why the results change.
Thirdly, if a government ignores a referendum it is because it wants to - not because of Brussels.
Fourthly, if the Brits are so keen on democracy, why do they keep voting anti-democratic clowns like Farage and co to represent them in Brussels?
"it is crystal clear they support a common market in goods and services and not much more" - Well, actually people support much more than that. It is also about free movement within EU (and less bureaucracy when travelling within Schengen countries). And also about EU intervening when the state of law is attacked (like the case of Romania this summer). Even a common currency helps international trade both at personal and company level. Did I mention the aquis communautaire which makes it easier for people and companies to adapt when settling or just doing business in another EU country? You ignoring these makes me think you are not an European.
The fact that countries are lining up to join the EU should give some food for thought.
So what does Hague say the problems are?
- "structuring the bloc so countries could pursue different levels of integration" - he and his guys might want that, but it is definitely not supported by all EU countries;
- "dealing with a lack of democratic legitimacy and accountability" - really? The EU representatives are elected just like a normal parliament and government are elected;
- "getting the right balance between what the EU does and does not do" - right, he is afraid of losing power. So it is actually his problem, not the problem of the EU.
Hague sounds to me like a typical politician fearing his position and trying to manipulate the electorate.
The country that applied next after Croatia is Turkey. Wikipedia: "Turkey has the world's 15th largest GDP-PPP and 17th largest nominal GDP...The GDP growth rate from 2002 to 2007 averaged 7%, which made Turkey one of the fastest growing economies in the world during that period. However, growth slowed to 1% in 2008, and in 2009 the Turkish economy was affected by the global financial crisis, with a recession of 5%. The economy was estimated to have returned to 8% growth in 2010."
Balkan countries? Yes (well, at least with part of their surface). Poor, waiting to send their Roma to go west? Definitely not.
If public sentiment really was as you say, then a government would stand up to Brussels following a failed referendum with massive voter support - which is all they care about.
You mentioned the Swiss. The only reason Switzerland has not applied to join the EU is the cantonal referendum system which give a minority of rich landholders in the small cantons as much voting power as the millions in the big cities. The cities voted for the EU years ago. As a democrat, you don't really want to wave Switzerland around as an example of anything.
I agree that the EU needs change. It's just a question of how that is achieved.
Despite the common perception Britain is on the hook for any ECB loss, Germany is on the hook for 18% of any loss and Britain like France for about 14%, they have as much as say as anyone. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Central_Bank
My point was that when citizens vote yes to integration, it is taken at face value and never revisited.
When people vote no to integration their vote is either ignored or the referendum is re-run.
I see this as totally undemocratic and disturbing, that is all.
@jpl82;
Your post is confusing to me, how are the British on the hook for 14% of ECB losses when they are not members of the Eurozone? As I understand it that should also mean they are not members of the ECB.
However, for the sake of having an honest discussion, I would like to point out that the people of Sweden voted in favour of joining the EU in November 1994 with a 53% majority; in Finland it was 57% in October of the same year. That was only 18 years ago, and in any case, well after the Maastricht treaty was signed. Should every member state organise a refendum every 10 years or so, in order to "re-affirm membership"? Well, of course eh, they have nothing else to do, don't they. While they're at it, they could also give the people a couple of referendums on whether they still want kings and queens "by the right of God" rather than democratically elected heads of States, but I digress...
Denmark seems to be pretty happy in the EU as well. Not that this kind of fact matters for blind EU-haters. Two years ago, a populistic right-wing government in DK reinstated border controls ("to keep criminals out", yeah right, all those criminals from Schleswig-Holstein and Meck-Pomm). This was an impopular measure and when that cabinet were voted out of power, the new government repealed these anti-Schengen measures, much to the relief of the population. Denmark enjoys a certain number of "opt-outs" on several EU common policies and the people is rather happy about that consensus. Abandoning any of these opt-outs would be subjected to a referendum and at the moment there is no question of doing such thing. Other than this, Denmark is an EU country like any other. I would like to ask you to come up with any evidence backing up your claims on Danes and Swedes being so desperate to leave the EU, and kept inside against the will of their peoples, but I have a feeling these "facts" came right out of your rear end.
In any case, there are lots of things we can criticise the EU for. Enough real shortcomings, not made-up ones. Thanks.
It seems you are the one who leaves out inconvenient facts in your analysis.
while you correctly point out that Sweden voted to join the EU in 1994 with a 53% majority after the Maastricht treaty came into force, you leave out the detail that they went on to have a referendum on joining the euro in 2003 and the voters rejected it by 56%. And no, the Swedes did not have any opt out clause, when they joined the EU 9 years earlier, their ascension treaty actually obliged them to join the euro so the later referendum results could very reasonably be interpreted as buyers remorse.
You say there are no plans in Denmark to give up the opt outs, but fail to mention that the pro euro camp did in fact organize a referendum to do just that in 2000, and lost it by 53% to 47%.
Btw, no facts come out of my rear end, just gold dust.
Of course, it would be fantastic to have an EU where members can just drop in when the feel like it and pull out when they don't. However, given the long-term nature of its aims it's really difficult to see how it would work. Besides, with the flip-flop nature of the most British governments they would still need another way. Maybe Europeans Monday thru Thursday, the 51st state on Friday and Saturday but solidly independent on Sundays.
I certainly agree with what you say here, moving ahead with a majority voting one way is certainly democratic.
What I meant in my earlier post was the way in which those who control the process have been for years ignoring votes or forcing revotes when the vote goes the "wrong" way, while when the vote goes the "right" way it is treated as legitimate and irreversible.
If people think this is the British National media peddling bad news about the E.U. then please pick a city in England (mainly middle England) and look at the surnames of the people committing the most violent crimes now. Particularly when the seasonal work becomes available.
Scotland will have the same problem in its referendum for independence - after a vote to remain in the UK the independence group will simply call for more referenda until one gives the 'right' answer and then it will all stop.
Referenda are not the solution-to-world-hunger tool many 'democrats' believe and, that is the reason most countries do not use them - they are not frightened or undemocratic or dictatorial but they know that a referendum is the wrong tool for this job. The results of a referendum depend on the celebrity status of the different champions, the state of the economy, who's been caught lying / sleeping around / telling racist jokes most recently, whether the Germans / French / English / favourite-baddie-nation is involved; indeed, anything but "is it a good idea?". I'm not disparaging people, this is human nature: when you don't know if something's a good idea you vote with your favourite personality. Or, at least today's favourite.
So, how can you democratically make a decision that will last for a century or more when most of those affected haven't even been born yet? I don't know. My solution is to go with change and work hard to make that change create a better world. Referenda are for those who believe in sound bites as a cure-all.