Published: 4 Feb 12 10:31 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.de/politics/20120204-40537.html
The justice minister in the state of Rhineland-Palatinate has sparked outrage after proposing that Germany could permit Sharia courts, which operate according to Islamic law, to preside over some civil cases in the country.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Chancellor Angela Merkel on Saturday called on Germans to fight prejudice against immigrants ahead of next week's integration summit. READ () »
Chinese Premier Li Keqiang will meet German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Sunday as the two export powerhouses seek to further strengthen economic ties amid brewing trade spats between Beijing and the EU. READ () »
Frankfurt city skyline is being celebrated this weekend with a skyscraper extravaganza. Hundreds of thousands of visitors are expected to witness spectacular events, daring feats and music in the sky. READ () »
German security services have been put on high alert after picking up terror warnings for public viewings of Saturday night's all-German Champions League final. READ () »
15 young children were taken to hospital late on Friday after bug-busting authorities in North Rhine-Westphalia accidentally dumped toxic insecticide over a primary school during playtime. READ () »
The head of the German central Bundesbank Jens Weidmann said on Friday that eurozone countries should be able to default, a possibility which the EU has gone to great lengths to avoid during the current crisis. READ () »
A Bayern Munich supporter is so desperate to get his hands on a ticket for Saturday's Champions League final against Borussia Dortmund he is offering to trade 20 litres of beer and a rare free table at Oktoberfest. READ () »
Germany could in the future have a country-wide “tolerable limit” for cannabis possession, it was reported on Friday. Currently, this amount differs between states. READ () »
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Sweden at thelocal.se
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
See all ads | Join the Marketplace
916 jobs available
672 new jobs this week
30 new jobs today
Dating
Looking for your own blonde bombshell? Or is the strong, silent type more your
style? Find a German sweetheart here.
Weather
"After clouds comes clear weather," say the Germans. But what about after that? Find out in The Local's weather
section.
Blog
German stuff that's distracting us today.
Noticeboard
Whether you want to buy, sell, hire, announce or promote something, here's the place to do it - completely free of
charge.
Discuss
Debate the news, ask for advice, make friends - or just let off steam.
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Your comments about this article:
everybody knows that nothing good has ever happened to any country that functions based on sharia law. All systems may have faults but sharia is the worst as we all know from the events happening around the world.
Over one half the school children in Germany are foreign born. Clearly, they have sealed the future and fate of a once great people by out-breeding their host.
Secondly, Sharia arbitration courts were introduced in 2008 in the UK and apparently are working good enough to attract even non-Muslims (~15% of the cases in 2010). It was not groundbreaking - Jewish 'beth din' arbitration courts are accepted in the UK for more than 100 years.
However, the problem is that Sharia is a religious law. How could Germany remain a secular state if one of its branches (the judiciary branch; the other two being executive and, respectively, legislature) would have a religious component? So my point is that Mr. Jochen Hartloff's idea is unconstitutional.
1. it would be entirely within German law
2. both parties agree to its use before hand
In this case the use of sharia arbitration is little different in concept to any other arbitration system with the advantage that a section of the population accept better the process.
@ChrisRea - Germany might be a secular state, but shops still can't open on Sunday :)
Chris, see my above comment. It applies to you ten fold. You think you are being progressive but you are being regressive. Neither of you must respect women to be in favour of such a cause.
Apparently you need a simplified version of the conclusion of my post above: I am against Mr. Jochen Hartloff's idea.
On the issue of Sharia vs. women - probably the biggest cultural difference between Sharia and Western law is that Sharia is based on interpretation, not on following the principles literally. That leads to progressive communities making progressive judgments to coexist with regressive communities making regressive judgments. And this is how come that, for example, Amra Bone, mother-of-four, is successfully serving at a Sharia court in the UK.
The world is not black&white and it is quite dynamic. So it is not a bad idea to revisit our personal convictions from time to time and keep an open eye on how the world is evolving. After all, you claim to be a progressive person yourself, don't you?
I am advocating that women have a choice whether or not they participate in such things. You, however, do not want to give them any choice but to do things only 'Runnerguy's way'.
Which respects women more?
"if you love muslim law so much why dont you move to muslim country"
It has nothing to do with 'love' or even 'agreement' but respect for other people and their ideas.
Grow up start giving due respekt to the women and pressurise media not to show whores like Heid Klum and Katzenberger as the rolemodel of women, rather those Westren women and their families who have scarifised their career, fame and money for kids and a strong family bonding.
You really can't have partial Sharia law (contract arbitration, say) for long as the system that is Sharia itself demands complete submission of all other systems.
The best you could hope for would be completely parallel legal systems in one geographical area - which has been done from time to time but proves unworkable to the best of my knowledge (though in a two-tiered system the overlords always claim it's working just fine LOL).
I don't think poor Herr Hartloff understands exactly what Sharia IS sufficiently, as evidenced by his comments about picking and choosing bits out of it :-)
Can you back up your statements with facts and figures or is it only hot air that you are blowing? Namely can you provide the percentage of cases when women 'got the short end' in Sharia arbitration courts in Western European cultures?
An proof of your understanding capacity would also be needed. What was the statement that made you conclude that my thinking is that Muslim culture is preferable to Western European culture? Oh wait, I forgot, you just admitted that you need cannot grasp complex concepts. Please use the simplified conclusion I offered Runnerguy45.
'You are asking that the basic fiber of the nation to be changed.' - Really? In which post/sentence did I do that? Perhaps you have 'I am against Mr. Jochen Hartloff's idea.' in mind? OK, apparently simple ideas like the latter are still difficult for you to grasp. Let's give it another shot: I think Sharia arbitration courts are unconstitutional, as they are based on religion. I enjoy very much living in a secular state. I am happy not to have to follow Christian, Jewish, Muslim or other religion's laws.See post #3 by 'twisted' for a similar opinion.
Is it any wonder Europe is sliding down crap hole,but must they pour any more oil on it to make it slide much faster.
Like Turkeys' voting for Christmas.
Perhaps, like Sharia arbitration, it helps to first conceive the possibility that others may not only have other ideas to your own but that those ideas may also have some merit.
It's amazing how many people who claim to speak and understand English have no clue that there is a difference between Muslim 'culture' and a 'Civil Law' based on certain tenets...
Again, if a country does introduce a parallel civil law, it is not tantamount to overthrowing the culture of that country nor does it imply that the existing laws need to be replaced for the entire populace.
Sharia law does not always mean stoning adulterers or castrating rapists or dismembering thieves!! It encompasses a wide range of social & criminal issues and the poor sod (Hartloff) here was simply suggesting that a few civil aspects be adopted. There are models of such parallel laws in peaceful co-existence in many countries (India, UK, France to name just a few). In such cases, both parties to a dispute must accept one OR the other law under which the dispute is to be settled. So Sharia law being there does not impose it upon Muslims - they are free to choose German Civil law.
But then, why am I bothering to explain to you bigots - any mention of Muslim / Islam / Sharia is just an invitation to jump onto your Islam-bashing hobby horses... You're all like Pavlov's dogs who salivate at the mere sound of the bell!!
Nah, who wudda thunk it?