Published: 1 May 10 10:49 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.de/politics/20100501-26911.html
After Belgium's parliament voted to ban Islamic full-face veils, the German vice-president of the European Parliament has called for a ban of the burka throughout Europe.
DPA/The Local (news@thelocal.de)
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
It's an intriguing premise: Are Germans ready to elect a Jewish politician chancellor? British journalist David Crossland has written a novel exploring themes of racism and neo-Nazi violence in Germany. The Local has excerpts. READ () »
A Bayern Munich supporter is so desperate to get his hands on a ticket for Saturday's Champions League final against Borussia Dortmund he is offering to trade 20 litres of beer and a rare free table at Oktoberfest. READ () »
Germany could in the future have a country-wide “tolerable limit” for cannabis possession, it was reported on Friday. Currently, this amount differs between states. READ () »
Job centres searching for photos of “ill” people at wild parties or statuses by “broke” people boasting about their new cars were warned on Friday it was illegal to use Facebook to spy on people suspected of abusing the benefits system. READ () »
Germany's oldest fraternity association could change its membership rules to include only ethnic Germans at their annual meeting this weekend, the country's media reported on Friday. READ () »
Get The Local flavour of Germany with our series offering an insider's take on their hometown. This week, Marcy Jarvis talks about her adopted town, Herrenberg. READ () »
Nearly half of all immigrants arriving in Germany are more highly skilled than their host country's residents, a study released on Friday revealed. READ () »
A leading German Catholic cardinal says the government should encourage women to stay at home and breed - rather than bring immigrants into the country to solve its demographic problems. READ () »
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Sweden at thelocal.se
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
See all ads | Join the Marketplace
903 jobs available
657 new jobs this week
0 new jobs today
Dating
Looking for your own blonde bombshell? Or is the strong, silent type more your
style? Find a German sweetheart here.
Weather
"After clouds comes clear weather," say the Germans. But what about after that? Find out in The Local's weather
section.
Blog
German stuff that's distracting us today.
Noticeboard
Whether you want to buy, sell, hire, announce or promote something, here's the place to do it - completely free of
charge.
Discuss
Debate the news, ask for advice, make friends - or just let off steam.
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Your comments about this article:
I wish burka was the only way to hide our intentions. Then, banning it would have solved most of the problems...
I don't want to sound anyhow intolerant , but there are simply certain things in life which when they are practiced or applied on certain situations or places, just don't fit. For instance, I would get used to the idea of seeing women in those burkas if I am somewhere in the middle east coz one could simply believe its part of their culture, but to see them in that same dress somewhere else looks a bit outrageous, probably coz its not the culture in other parts of the world....... and it can only bring that anxiety to those who are not used to seeing it or having it as part of their culture.
The main purpose in forbidding the burka is to express disapproval of a different culture. Nothing more or less.
Same with banning Minarets in Switzerland.
In France the authorities noticed young Muslim boys coming to public swimming pools wearing bulky surfer shorts rather than the speedo bikini type favored by the native french boys. The Muslims did so because their religon preaches modesty.
The authorities promptly banned the bulkier swimsuits, on the grounds of "hygene".
It seems to me all these bans have a lot more to do with plain old fashioned bigotry, rather than "arcitecture", or "public saftey", or "hygene".
"It's interesting. I was only talking about the burqa to a muslim woman
co-worker here. It's quite a convoluted cultural deal - the amount of
covering required is decreed by the local Imam, although in Oz some
chose the full covering, some part, some go for ordinary western
clothes. Underneath they are often wearing very provocative clothing. In
private they can wear whatever they like. The woman here was telling me
that she was at a wedding and all the women were covered up, and then
when the men were all gone they all stripped off, and all were wearing
extremely revealing clothing. The woman here said at first she was
showing more skin than any other woman in the place, but after they
removed their robes she was suddenly the most covered woman there."
Of course these are things that have been falsely demonized in western culture.
As western culture is constructed to divide not unite.
I can imagine this expanded on any culture and also on men. The Key is that person desires to do this and isnt forced too -if thats the case i have no problem with it and law enforcement of how you should appear or look contradicts any kind of common sense for personal liberty. Im pretty sure it will be proven unconstitutional anyway.
I agree that a good chunk of society does not function with the burka and it should be 'banned'. Though, I'm sure clever people can come up with a compromise; after all ski masks are made to roll up when necessary.
Outside this, I believe a blanket ban would be counter productive. Given the choice, I think few would choose a burka unless it became 'cool' in an anti-establishment way.
What everyone needs to know, that if a woman is wearing the burka, especially in Europe, is that she truly is doing it of her OWN free will and choice for her religion. I don't believe it's correct to impose others views on what a person would like to do for their religion. That's just hypocritical. If people are allowed to walk around half naked ( and even naked in some parts) They should also have the right to cover up!
Looshe, if they want to cover up..They can cover their hair ..but their face needs to be recognizable... beyond the shadow of a doubt. Where do people walk around 1/2 naked in todays Cities and streets??? Perhaps the Aborginies in Austraila do ..but they arent strapping bombs to themselves either.. and they arent walking into the local pubs....
At the very same time we hear these passionate cries that we must see faces in public for "security" reasons, we hear equally strong arguments against Google taking pictures in public for the internet based on "privacy" concerns.
Can it be that anti Muslim bigotry and anti American chauvinism inform both arguments to some extent?
I would just like to see the face of the person who is going to blow me up with a bomb vest strapped under her burka.
-Xenophobic.....
We support the concepts of freedom of speech and freedom of expression, as long as it doesn't interfere with others. We also (theoretically) support freedom of religion, again as long as it doesn't take away the rights of others.
In this case, the dress in one religion is being called into question. In truth it would be no different than saying a Priest can't wear his collar, a very definitive article of clothing.
So, what's different? Two things.
1. The clothing is deemed "wierd" by westerners in countries where it is seldom seen. It flies in the face of western dress, where woman are allowed, or even encouraged to dress provocatively. So, unrelated to religion, there is a cultural clash, and the culture can present tremendous pressure. Just ask a high school student who doesn't conform to current styles.
2. This choice of dress is, unfortunately, attached to a religion that has issues in the western cultures. While the bulk of Islam is not radical, the public perception is much different. Why? I think the problem is largely based upon the concept that once September 11th happened, the rest of Islam did not rush to condemn the attack. That silence quickly became seen as acceptance or support for what had happened.
So, many in the world, rightly or wrongly, see Islam as a terrorist religion, and every subsequent attack helps to further that perception. So anything overtly Islam must be bad. The minnirettes (sp?) in Switzerland, and now the burkas in Europe.
It is probably true there is a slight public safety issue with the clothing, but that's not what's driving this discussion, it's only a handy excuse and a semi-factual basis for justification.
wa
Kudos!
Public safety is only one thing. Most societies rely to a very large extent on body language and facial recognition. Every time you visit an amt, bank or get on a bus with a passcard the system only works properly when you as a person are 'recognized' as being a person.
Somebody made a comparison to a nun's habit, but the habit deliberately allows for body language - the burka deliberately obscures it.
Maybe, one day, human society will be able to function without the animal instincts we have inherited from 10 million years ago - but, then will we be human?
If one wants to live in a western society, they should assimilate in both language and attire.
If a western woman travels to some countries in the Middle East, she is not permitted to walk around in shorts. Observance of society rules goes both ways. Men who insist that their women be covered so as not to be a temptation to other men are insecure. In western society, most everything is based on temptation or appeal. One cannot live a secluded life except in a secluded society.
For those that becry tolerance, please ask a burkha wearer in Europe to tolerant of european customs.
Someone also commented that underneath the burkha women are very often less than modest. That's actually quite obvious. They are not made of light material and it's got to be hot under there.
Unlike pesch and some other posters, I'm quite optimistic for the future of germany with a larger muslim proportion because the vast majority of muslims here are very happy with the single society idea - and women do participate. There will probably be a small teenager movement doing the exact opposite of their parents and wanting the burka but, like most teenagers, they'll get over it once they have a family to think about.
The danger with all the anti-burka rhetoric is that it may generate a pro-burka backlash and so even tighter controls; thus, giving moderates a pyrrhic victory. So I'm with you, minimal controls just to enable most of society to work - participation in society is natural for humans so let nature take care of the anti-social burka.
Have you ever been to a middle eastern country. In most of them Westerners are allowed to completely ignore the cultural shame strictures of the local populace, walking around in Bikinis and the like. In this sense, most of the Middles East is more tolerant than the West. What these laws do, is identical to what a law forcing a women not to wear any sort of a top would do to Westerners. This is the severity of the law for the people that it will effect. If one would like to argue that women are 'forced' to wear Burka, than one must also note that women are 'forced' to wear tops whereas men can go anywhere in warm enough weather without one. That argument is then null. As is the argument concerning 'I can't discern intention with the face covered', well I think that men should walk around with their pants off then so we can see how excited they are and question them if they look too excited...rediculous as well.
I challange someone on this page to come up with an argument that isn't non sequitor, ignorantly ethnocentric, or smacking of the British cult of moral control that lead to the fascistic anti-social behavior orders.