May 21, 2012
Published: 1 Dec 11 10:48 CET
Updated: 1 Dec 11 12:05 CET
Online: http://www.thelocal.de/national/20111201-39239.html
Britain and Germany called for sanctions to financially isolate Iran as EU foreign ministers gathered to consider tough new measures against Tehran due to fresh concerns over its nuclear programme.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Weighing 110 kilograms, Bruno “the Orca” Dobelmann may not look like an athlete, but on Monday he set off to swim across Lake Constance in just a pair of trunks. If he succeeds, the German will set a new world record. READ »
Ex-federal banker turned controversy merchant Thilo Sarrazin has attracted fresh outrage with a book claiming Germany's European policy is driven by guilt for World War II and the Holocaust. READ (4 COMMENTS) »
A German man died on Mount Everest where he was helping clear the world's highest peak of rubbish, Nepalese tourism officials announced. His death brings the season's toll to five. READ (1 COMMENT) »
A man was arrested on Saturday for using the centre of the historic German city of Cologne as a driving range, after one of his wayward iron shots hit a taxi. READ (1 COMMENT) »
A German Islamist has called for the murder of members of a far-right party that regularly provokes ultra-conservative Muslims using cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, it was reported over the weekend. READ (16 COMMENTS) »
NATO leaders on Sunday gave the go-ahead for the new European missile shield, provoking anger in Russia. The US air base in Ramstein, western Germany, will host part of the system. READ (2 COMMENTS) »
US President Barack Obama and German Chancellor Angela Merkel agreed on Saturday the eurozone should not abandon fiscal reforms even as it pursues measures to revive growth, the White House said. READ (11 COMMENTS) »
After the embarrassing cancellation of the new Berlin airport opening and the shock of the new date being in nine months, the team is under extra pressure to make sure it works this time. READ (3 COMMENTS) »
See all ads | Join the Marketplace
1116 jobs available
797 new jobs this week
136 new jobs today
More news from Sweden at thelocal.se
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
Dating
Looking for your own blonde bombshell? Or is the strong, silent type more your
style? Find a German sweetheart here.
Weather
"After clouds comes clear weather," say the Germans. But what about after that? Find out in The Local's weather
section.
Blog
German stuff that's distracting us today.
Noticeboard
Whether you want to buy, sell, hire, announce or promote something, here's the place to do it - completely free of
charge.
Discuss
Debate the news, ask for advice, make friends - or just let off steam.
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Your comments about this article:
Thirty years of sanctions against Iran is an example of Western hypocrisy -- it may be recalled that the U.S. and its allies whined about "using oil as an economic weapon" when some OPEC countries cut exports to the West in the 1970s.
Another incredibly self-serving line of thought in the West is that Iran somehow would be "escalating" an illegal military strikes against it by defending itself.
Years after the attack on the U.S. embassy they still have not learned anything about how to behave,remember the figurehead was a "student" at that time.
The time for talking is fast very fast ending and the time for action is ripe.
@Procivic
Why do they need so many nuclear plants for "peaceful" purposes ?.
Also where are the Muslims protesters on the street call for action against the attack on the British embassy, maybe it just has not been reported yet?
"If we stand together we can rid the Iranian people of the leaders"
What gives us the right to interfere in the internal affairs of Iran? I thought we learnt something from the infamous US actions to install US-favourable dictators in different countries.
"Why do they need so many nuclear plants for "peaceful" purposes ?" - How many are we talking about? 4? 5? That's a lot, indeed. And anti-Iran propaganda is extremely powerful.
I agree with @ChrisRea and @Procivic. The United States should stay out of other countries problems. If the USA had not interfered in Europe in World War 1 or with Hitler and WW II Germany would have controlled all of Europe and Africa and we would not have the problems we do today.
Feeling for the millions of good people in Iran? The mistake is thinking Israel can start a war with Iran without US approval.
Yes, Israel can bomb and kills thousand or millions of Iranians? After Israel attacks Iran, how will Israel a nation 7 million, invaded and occupy a nation 75 million?
The Christian and Jewish religious population in Iran is about 2 percent.
If the people in Israel have divine protection, it is called, the US, British and EU militaries, when the poop hits the fan.
@ Englishted
Why do European countries have so many nuclear plants and nuclear bombs?
Before there was a Europe and US civilizations, there was advance science and knowledge by non-Europeans.
When did science, knowledge and world resources, self-determination of human beings become the sole proprieties of Europeans and Americans?
This is a country where "Death to America" is a daily chant, and that has publicly declared that it wants to wipe Israel off the face of the map. We should trust them with nuclear weapons? Get real. I'm not an American, but I certainly don't think we should trust them with anything more dangerous than a piece of string, for the time being.
And no, I am not arguing that that means they don't have the "right" to nuclear power. I'm saying that that is not relevant. They are @#$%ing crazy, and they want to hurt us - that is the only relevant part. That and the fact that we're stronger - a lot stronger. Strong enough to make all of the middle east stop existing inside of a day.
So, if I could give Iran any piece of advice, it would be to stop screwing around. Here are the cold, hard facts: We're not willing to accept you as a nuclear power as long as you're hostile to us. We are a thousand-fold more powerful than you are. And if you should ever get the silly notion that you could drop a nuke on western forces or allied cities, your country will turn into a wasteland for the next 25,000 years. The end.
damned straight! I'm glad some people are actually using their brains around here...
Yes "anti-Iran propaganda is extremely powerful. "
I heard it stormed a embassy and brutally put down anti government demonstrators following last years free and fair elections.
@septiSeverus
"When did science, knowledge and world resources, self-determination of human beings become the sole proprieties of Europeans and Americans?"
It is not what about China and India?
However I for one don't let somebody get a stick to beat me with if I can prevent it.
@Pakistani
If you think what you wrote in your last paragraph then you are strange indeed .
@SchwabHallRocks
I do love a little irony thanks .
I do not understand what you mean, It is not what about China and India?
My question was,
When did science, knowledge and world resources, self-determination of human beings become the sole proprieties of Europeans and Americans?
And, you did not answer my other question. Why do European countries have so many nuclear plants and nuclear bombs?
Three European countries , Britain,France ,and Russia.Have Bombs
If you notice the countries that won in WW2 and sit on the U.N. security council are the main holders .That seams to have kept the peace at least ,nuclear peace.
I am sorry but I just do not trust Iran to have the bomb ,maybe that is racist then so be it .
"When did science, knowledge and world resources, self-determination of human beings become the sole proprieties of Europeans and Americans?"
I don't understand what you mean an/or why you say that.
"Three European countries , Britain,France ,and Russia.Have Bombs"
"If you notice the countries that won in WW2 and sit on the U.N. security council are the main holders .That seams to have kept the peace at least ,nuclear peace."
Well, to be honest, I personally would not consider France as a country who won the Second World War. In fact they were totally defeated by the German Wehrmacht in just a few weeks. The French resistance weakened the German occupation, but without the help of their allies - especially the U.S., Russia and the United Kingdom - they would have never been capable of freeing themselves.
The reason why there has not been a nuclear war until now (and hopefully will not be a nuclear war in the future) is that people are simply afraid of its consequences - a nuclear war would not only "threaten" the ordinary people, but also the ones who are in power. There would not be any victourious party, but only defeated ones.
It's not the fact that Britain, France, Russia, China and the United States have a permanent seat in the United Nations security council and thus a right to intervene with a veto.
This right to intervene with a veto has even proven to be harmul to world peace because every time Israel wanted to continue its policy of settlement the United States took advantage of its right to veto. The same with Russia and China who frequently block any attemps which come from France, Russia and Britain.
Furthermore you need to wonder whether the right to veto actually has an effect at all because when a country has the power to do something it will just do what it wants to do no matter whether the other ones do veto or not.
In my opinion changing the members who have a permanent seat is long ovedue. China as an emerging super power - yes. The United States as the only super power left - yes. Russia - yes. But the United Kingdom and France? Why, just because they were part of the victourious (what France was not)? Because they have nuclear weapons? Pakistan and India also have nuclear weapons.
Considering Iran: I don't think that they would use any nuclear weapons against Israel, the US or Europe. They surely know that Iran would cease to exist if they did so. However there is the danger that terrorists could receive weapons from Iran though I believe that the Iranians would not do that on purpose. Secret intelligence would find out and therefore the would also cease to exist.
Yes, we can see the farcical self justification of super power actions The Germans were accused of blindly giving in themselves to a Fanatic,anti-Semite, white supremacist and world power expansionist Hitler.The war left Germany with equal thermo nuclear destruction, due to conventional and carpet bombing. War against major axis power was over. And yet the major allied power, the U.S found it "convenient" to drop two nuke bombs on colored Japan to bring war in the East to speedy conclusion after it was almost won over.
Soon after WW2 ,the well kept secret between the U.K & US had become everybody's secret with Russia and France joining in the 'the bomb' guaranteed nuclear peace club.
Britain and Germany may urge EU to isolate Iran,which can never dream of assaulting the West, but both together - the EU and Iran, may admit security failure, should the feared Iranian Nukes yet to be hatched up, fall into the hold of Islamic Terrorists.
Finally, Britain as a former victor, can keep the option of urging the EU to isolate Germany from threatened economic belligerence!
"When did science, knowledge and world resources, self-determination of human beings become the sole proprieties of Europeans and Americans?"
I don't understand what you mean an/or why you say that.
Other advanced human civilizations gifted or passed Science and knowledge on to Western civilization. I am not over looking the achievements of Europeans.
Science and knowledge are not the sole inventions of Western civilization.
Europeans developed nuclear technology and were the first people to use a nuclear bomb on other human beings.
It was a bad idea then, as it is today. If or when it is used again, it will be more devastating and this time and not only will non-Europeans suffer.
Iran has the natural resources, bright minds and money to buy the scientific knowhow from other bight minds. Same as the US and USSR did?
The world population is over 7 billion people. Over 1 billion people are European white people, give or take with mixing and those who consider themselves white people.
Why should 20 percent of the worlds population, control, influence and consume most of the worlds resources?
Not to mention destroying the world environment and dictating their Western civilization versions of freedoms, religions and human rights to 6 billion non-white peoples?
Well when you come up with
"Europeans developed nuclear technology and were the first people to use a nuclear bomb on other human beings. "
I can no longer believe you know your history.
You also don't take India and China into your calculations on who uses which resources .Without our version of freedom look what happens in other places.
Never said or will I ever feel, I know it all? Please informed me who developed nuclear technology and used it on Human beings before the Americans?
Please, before you answer let me say this… what I do know, it was not developed into a bomb by the Nazis or tested on Jews before it was used on other human beings.
As for China and Indian. Today they are hired help and producers for the West. They now have the same technologies to be in that club, but this not my point.
No disrespect to China and India or its peoples.
" Britain as a former victor can keep the option of urging the EU to isolate Germany....." 'Can keep the option' is not a subjective suggestion but personal observation. This is because Britain, ever since the declaration of the first German Reich and started distinguishing imported German products by stamping "Made in Germany", herself became a victim to jealous and hateful follies. With rationalized industrial quality production and cheaper prices, the demarcated German products boomed in local sales, augmenting more eye sore.
Even 66y after war, Britain never really made any genuine efforts of reconciliation with Germany and rewrite history books exonerating the past to which they themselves hold a major cause of responsibility.