A recent surge in politically motivated violence by leftist radicals has German authorities holding their breath ahead of May 1, the traditional day of worker protest. David Wroe reports on the simmering anger on the far left.
In radical left-wing circles they’re known as “sport groups” – teams of young men whose game is beating up neo-Nazis.
“Maybe a punch in the face … then I’d say, ‘Okay, he’s lying on the ground, that’s enough.’ I don’t want to kill anybody,” explains Lukas, 25.
Lukas sits drinking a beer in a bar that’s a popular hangout for Berlin’s leftist scene. He wears a jacket of the popular white-bread Jack Wolfskin brand. Indeed there is nothing that readily identifies him as a radical anti-fascist – often shortened to
Antifa in German.
Yet Lukas was in many such brawls in his younger days. Well-built and trained in martial arts, he survived them unscathed, though a friend once caught a broken bottle in the face and still has a thick scar to prove it.
Although he has retired from "sport" and moved into more organised political activity, Lukas says he’s still comfortable justifying violence against neo-Nazis – which is why he doesn’t want his full name used.
“A friend once told me, ‘You have to speak the language that people understand.’ Those guys, the neo-Nazis, they don’t understand any other language. Why should we be the only ones to refrain?”
Violence, it seems, is increasingly the language of Germany’s estimated 6,300 hardcore leftists. Last month, Germany’s Interior Ministry announced there were 9,375 left-wing crimes committed in 2009 – a 39.4 percent rise on the previous year.
Violent crime – which includes arson – rose even more sharply, jumping 53.4 percent to a total of 1,822 offences.
Flashpoint Berlin
In Berlin, which along with Hamburg is the main leftist flashpoint, the figures are more dramatic still: an 87 percent jump in crime and a 144 percent rise in violent crime, according to figures supplied to The Local by the capital city’s domestic intelligence agency, the
Verfassungsschutz.
For the first time since the current system of record-keeping began in 2001, assaults committed nationally by the left outnumbered those by the right – 849 against 800. Virtually all of the left-wing assaults were directed either at police during rallies or at neo-Nazis.
Meanwhile, hundreds of cars have been torched and attacks launched against big companies and property developments in gentrifying neighbourhoods. In the most brazen attack, about 10 masked attackers set upon a manned police station in Hamburg, setting a patrol car on fire and hurling stones through the windows.
With the traditional left-wing day of protest, May Day, coming up on Saturday, authorities are bracing themselves.
Not only are there more attacks and more people prepared to use violence, there is also a new daring to the militancy, said Heinz Fromm, director of the federal
Verfassungsschutz agency.
“Violence on the street and attacks planned in secret are rising, and in some cases go beyond the kind of attacks commonly seen before, such as the use of gas cartridge incendiary devices,” he told The Local.
“The attack on a police station in Hamburg in December is indicative of a new standard. These demand the heightened attention of the security services.”
Gentrification a cause?
The causes of this surge are complex, but the gentrification of previously poor and working class neighbourhoods, which brings the wealth gap into stark relief, is clearly playing a role.
“Look around you,” says self-proclaimed leftist radical Florian Laumeyer, 32, eating ice cream in Lausitzerplatz in the heart of Berlin's Kreuzberg district. “Three or four years ago, it was only immigrants or poor people living here. Now there’s no one of an immigrant background. It’s all middle-class white people.”
Once a scruffy part of West Berlin butting up to the Iron Curtain, Kreuzberg has a tradition of May Day riots stretching back to the 1980s and is now one of the front lines in the city's gentrification battle. Wealthier residents are moving into leftist and anarchist heartlands such as Kreuzberg and neighbouring Friedrichshain, pushing up rents and fuelling the clandestine attacks on cars, offices and upmarket property developments.
The tactic is working, according to Florian Herbs, 26, an unemployed graphic designer and member of the radical group Antifascist Revolutionary Action Berlin (ARAB). While he admits that car-burning has become a fashionable “cult,” he maintains that attacks on the upmarket property developments in Kreuzberg are a legitimate expression of anger – and are a real deterrent to gentrification.
“Now nobody wants to buy one of those apartments,” he says.
At the other end of the scale from such local battles, the banners for the radical left are broad, even nebulous concepts: anti-militarism, anti-repression, anti-fascism.
“The left-wing extremist scene is made up of a very heterogeneous group of people with different ideological views,” says Stefan Ruppert, an expert on extremism and an MP for the pro-business Free Democratic Party.
“Only the vague goal of overthrowing our existing social order serves as a unifying effect. This complexity … makes it all the more difficult to grasp the problem as a whole and work out solutions.”
Parsing violence
Leftists bristle at the suggestion that increasing violence is in danger of making them as bad as the neo-Nazis they hate. As Lukas the former “sportsman” puts it: “The difference is that we don’t go around beating immigrants. And I don’t see a problem with attacking people who do.”
Yet left-wing radicals’ defence that they only attack property, neo-Nazis or symbols of the state – including police during demonstrations – is fiercely rejected by authorities and by the police union.
“Last year on May 1 in Berlin, police were deliberately attacked to a degree that could have had fatal consequences,” police union head Rainer Wendt told The Local.
“In their expressions of violence, the extreme left and extreme right are barely distinguishable from one another.”
The number of left-wing attacks on Berlin security authorities such as police climbed from 156 in 2008 to 209 last year, according the city’s
Verfassungsschutz officials.
And with incendiary gas cartridge assaults on government buildings, police stations or symbols of capitalism such Berlin’s Economy House, which was bombed in February, attackers “knowingly accepted endangerment of human life,” said a spokeswoman for the
Verfassungsschutz.
No one is sure what to expect on Saturday, though both sides have been talking up the tension. The police union’s Wendt said he feared there would “serious rioting.”
Left-wing activists are celebrating their success in February for blockading a far-right march in Dresden commemorating the 1945 allied bombing of the city. They will try the same when neo-Nazis march on Saturday, forcing the police to intervene.
“Maybe there will be clashes,” says ARAB activist Florian Herbs. “Maybe some people will start throwing things. There is a dynamic to the moment that we can’t control.
“We hope it will stay peaceful, but with the capitalist crisis and gentrification, people are very angry. We’ll see what happens.”
Your comments about this article:
Ongoing discussion about whether someone should go protest with their kids in regards to the planned Nazi demo in Berlin.
A neo-nazi CHOOSES his path of intolerance and inhumanity - an immigrant doesn't. If you really can't see the difference then you're probably half way to becoming one yourself.
Anyone battering a Nazi of any sort is a human hero.
The last time there was this kind of wide spread clashes of Marxist and fascist thugs in Germany was in the 1920's and 30's and both groups hated the Conservative and Social-Democrat moderates and today both the far-left and far-right attack Israel. Very disturbing.
If you can't understand that then it's no wonder things 'disturb' you. Try reading a book.
these labels are foisted upon any concerned citizens by these so called left wing marxists (who are in fact neo nazi fasicts)
anyone using violence and intimidation to silence the thoughts, ideas, and voices of others are like hitlers brownshirts.
winstin churchill said: in the future the real fascists will call themselves leftists.
the nazis called themselves socialists NSDAP, and facist stalin called hisself a communist; (russia was under a stalinist facsist dictatorship, nothing to do with communism according to marx; read das capital and the original communist manifesto. these ideologys like islam have for years and years been hijacked by extremists, and modified to fit there own eveil agendas. of fascist rule.
It's funny proposal, but then you'd go directly from Hitler's Todestag (April 30) to the anniversary of the Red Army's conquest of Berlin (May 2). That might be too much Vergangenheitsbewältigung bzw. Geschichtsaufarbeitung at one stretch.
"The REAL nazis and facists are the left wing idiots! anyone concerned about immigration and islam and want to be proud of there own national identity, culture and indigenous roots is NOT a rascist! or a nazi! "
Well said my friend, you have your head screwed on correctly, unlike some of the red scum that wish to impose anarchy and totalitarianism on the rest of us.
As you will know we have our local Council and General elections on May 6th. I am a member of the British National Party, the only party that truly reflects the wishes of the British people. During the campaign the 'left' have issued death threats, tried to attack our Chairman Nick Griffin MEP, attacked BNP members and the Police. They get let off lightly for whatever they do despite being a bunch of drunken and drug fuelled Government and Union backed thugs.
But the British public are waking up and are totally sick of these idiots, and the so-called 'mainstream political parties.
Change is coming, and it cannot come quickly enough!
Well said?! Illiterate fascistic babble is more like it.
If the British National Party is "the only party that truly reflects the wishes of the British people," let's see how well it does in the elections next week.
I think we will do well despite the machinations of the state controlled media and TV!
Kind of the ultimate "Tea Party" demonstration, but with out guns."
Yeah, kind of, except the almost complete lack of violence, arrests, vandalism and littering at the the hundreds of tea parties involving hundreds of thousands of people that have taken place. Other than being completely different, they are pretty much the same, yeah.
I'm sorry that neighborhoods change and that those changes make people uncomfortable, but society evolves...and so do neighborhoods. Many (not all) of those who feel left behind or disenfranchised have made the choices that place them there: a decision to skip education, a lack of effort to better themselves, and similar attitudes. That does not make them wrong, but they have no one to blame but themselves for the positions they fine themselves in.
In the end, the money that might be spent improving life for all is spent dealing with the damages and law enforcement costs associated with unlawful behavior. Sad.
wa
Right. "One of these days", so we'll condemn them now for imaginary violence in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
"People with that demonstrable lack of intelligence should not be allowed anywhere near firearms."
I take it you don't own a gun.
What's really disturbing, is that two posts after your defense of nationalism, a member of the BNP (a neo-nazi ally in Britain) defends you with the exact same rhetoric they use to defend themselves and their support of neo-nazis.
Their are alot of very confused people posting here, reardless, I thought this article was an example of excellent journalism. Multiple perspectives are provided and reading the article it didn't seem like any of those perspectives was pushed as being the ultimate. It was refreshing to read this article a piece pushing against the idiotic unsupportable tide of moral absolutism and status quo ball-n-chain argumentation.
In point of fact I own several guns, and have owned guns for many years. I just don't brandish them at public political rallies.
I think you missed my snark, but for the record, I don't think being slightly slow shouldn't preclude someone from owning a gun, so don't worry.
I've been to a couple tea parties and haven't seen any gun brandishing. But I did see some video of a guy at a tea party with a gun that MSNBC conveniently cropped because the man was black. Gotta do something when media generated memes collide I guess. They had to choose between "racist", and "gun toting/potentially violent". They went with the latter in this case and deliberately altered the video accordingly.
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/kyle-drennen/2009/08/18/msnbc-no-mention-black-gun-owner-among-racist-protesters
I didn't miss your snark. I didn't think it was worthy of a rejoinder.
Apparently you missed the gun rallies in Virginia and DC last week, however. They were brandishing loaded firearms on the Virginia side of the Potomac.
And if you haven't seen all the weapons on display at the tea party rallies since last April, you haven't been very observant. I'm sure YouTube has plenty of footage that would give you a woody.
So blame MSNBC for the way it crops a shot of a lunatic with a gun at a rally. Don't blame Faux News, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin and the other crazies who are inciting their idiot base to violence. Don't worry, pal, it's coming. It'll probably start in Arizona where a carry permit's no longer required. It will be interesting to watch from here. Let the good times roll.
As I discussed in another post, anger, which is an emotion, is like "destructive poison" to humans. And did you notice that leftist individuals said that their violence is the result of anger?
True dat.
@ wmm208
You're arguments betray the worst kind of ignorance, an ignorance devoid of the inconvenience of any facts.
@ logicguy
Their are different ways in which one can calculate innocence and guilt. There is no absolute.
Your ignorance would be funny if it wasn't so tragic and an indication of the general problem with education in the US, lack of an understanding of history.
The NSDAP, under Hitler, was a neo-monarchist affair aiming to conserve the relationship of the leadership to the people that existed in other empires and aiming to conserve traditional values. So they were conservative authoritarians aiming for the collective good. The left during that time period in Germany was composed of progressives that sought to decentralize society through incremental policy changes, even the KPD was advocating for a more democratic Germany.
These things must be understood in context. That might seem complicated, but it is simply the case.
However, we should be taught to view governments on how they govern. In that, the far left and far right are essentially IDENTICAL. Both rule as dictatorships that use fear and force as primary methods. Plus the elimination of individual rights, free speech, etc.
From this article, I can see SOME difference between Germany's left and right wing extremes--but only in ideology, not in their actions.
Not even close. When the NSDAP came into power they reverted to monarchical ways, a centralization, they ran on the platform that democracy was forced down the throughts of the people without their consent. They were conservatives in this sense, trying to keep tradition alive. The communists, (let's use the russian example) actually are an example of decentralization having taken over from the regime that proceeded them they did not attempt to conserve the power structure in place in fact the made a new and relatively more democratic power structure, one that would involve central comittees in which at leas a few had a vote.
To say that aside from wealth these two systems were/are identical is either dishonest or idiotic.
In the modern context, neo-nazis are gangs that focus on beating up immigrant families, couples, children. They are gangs in the sense that they share compositional features such as members tending to be of low socioeconomic status and illiterate (this is in part society's fault). Active Antifa groups focus on pushing back neo-nazis and forcing them out of situations in which they cause trouble through the use of violence. Though I wouldn't do what Antifa does, I can't blame them for wanting to protect their communities and I don't think many of us can understand the very real threat that neo-nazis pose (though alot of the posters here seem to be American and the U.S. has the largest documented per capita presence of neo nazis in the world). This is not a defense it's a clarification for those who don't seem to understand why some differentiate the forms of violence used by either group.
Say what you will about violence, but one cannot say that Antifa is a danger to anyone except those who condone silently the neo-nazi marchers (police) or the neo-nazis themselves.
Ultimately, what is most disturbing is the double standard of some of the American's posting about the left. You same folk who I have seen post about 'Germans letting the Nazis rise to power' now protest when Antifa attempts to squash the neo-nazis?!?
For most people, there are two ways of running a country, the way you are brought up with and the wrong way. It actually takes a long time - in my experience as an ex-pat watcher - for people to (a) recognise that there are other valid systems and (b) their own system has some glaring flaws and (c) there is no 'solution', just options with different trade-offs.
Well said and well classified, though I don't think most of the idiots have ever left their home states/regions/provinves for anything other than 'state-condoned mass murder to the march of trumpets and drums' as Voltaire so named war and it's hard to experience another people in such a context.
Let's take a quick look at ACTUAL Leftist ideology vs. Right-Wing ideology:
True Leftists believe in a more direct democracy. Right-Wingers do not.
Leftists believe that the workers and the poor should have their say, Conservatives (in the American usage of the term) believe that money is god.
Leftists are against all forms of racism, sexism, and bigotry in general, Right-Wingers are the bigots to end all bigots.
And that doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of the differences between right and left. Read a book for Christ's sake. Or at least Wikipedia.
Off the mark in the other direction. What follows is a simplification and generalization, though prepared in the best fashion I could manage for such a short commentary. Communists are ('were' in the case of North Korea) left wing, they are progressives at base and this is expressed in the freedom and decentralization that occured following their take-overs in both China and Russia from the monarchs existing before them (similar situation for Cuba). Though progressive in a much slower (ungodly slow) manner than occurs elsewhere they are progressive decentralizers as compared to their predecessors. Independent of this trait Stalin also set up a system of ethnocentric collective violence based off of what many scholars take to be fundamental misread or intentional bastardization of Marx. Mao set of a conservative undercurrent in the cultural revolution, parts of which sought to excise any influence of the West on the East in China. These are the risks one runs allowing for any sort of centralised authority figure even with the backdrop of overall decentralization.
As for Socialism, you're definately a mainland American, given the fact that the only place on the planet that Socialism is a dirty word is the U.S. It doesn't make sense in the year 2010 to play like Socialism and Communism can be treated as identical things.
As for your left right characterization, for the current date, I would mostly agree to a less severe but similar argument though I would also point out that your argument approaches the oversimplified idiocy displayed by your opposites on this same article.
Short and straight to the point statements are more effective.
There are angry people on the far left and right. I'm sure that both sides would find it easier to make "Real Changes", if they were to take on a non-emotional, more intellectual approach to things.
Godforbid anything more than a soundbite is pushed out there.
As for your 'non-emotionalism', why not just have everyone give everyone else handjobs, that's just as overly simplistic a solution yet it has the benefit of being more desirable.
Or are they gonna be hypocrites and make excuses for the idiots within minority communities who oppress their own people?
As Blaise Pascal once wrote "I apologise for writing this long letter, I didn't have time to write a short one."
Its the content-free posts, long or short, that are the nuisance.
Communism, Socialism, Nazism are all fancy names for people who string Barbed wire around their countries and murder their citizens as they attempt to leave.
Everybody's time would be better spent limiting the Government and increasing Freedom. Read some Ron Paul.
You mean the same Ron Paul endorsed by multiple fascist 'white power' groups? That's odd isn't it?
Or in the case of Arizona, attempt to enter.
Ron Paul, like the other pseudo-libertarians who call themselves "tea partiers," wants something for nothing from government. They want "small" government until disasters arise that only a big government can respond to. Katrina and the BP oil rig disasters come to mind. They bitch about paying to much in taxes, while the U.S. has the lowest tax rates in the industrialized world. They believe that every individual should take responsibility for his own life and actions, but demand that government be the first responder to any crisis. They demand "freedom" from government while demanding that government pass and enforce laws such as those targeting Hispanics in Arizona to deprive them of their rights. They can't get their catechism straight, and are ultimately too obtuse to see the contradictions in their own positions.
In short, they are petulant, uninformed, whining know-nothings -- racist to the core societal misfits. They are irrelevant. Their spiritual leader, Ayn Rand, is to politics what L. Ron Hubbard is to religion -- both charlatan hucksters making a buck from the grave.
Or it could be that those on the far right, the Neo Nazis in this case beat up innocents.
Far Right Nazis? Aren't Nazi's National Socialist? Yes, yes, they are.
Love Big Government much?
You would think someone as Highly Educated and Intelligent such as yourself could see the Problems created by Govt.s over the course of History.
Oh no, but it will ALL be Different this time, really! Right!
"Far Right Nazis? Aren't Nazi's National Socialist? Yes, yes, they are."
You might have memory problems, I've already explained this to you in another forum.
I've copy-pasted the following from my posts on the http://www.thelocal.de/national/20100506-27027.html Board:
"I shouldn't have to get into this, but you obviously recieved very little in the way of education about the NSDAP, they were not Socialists, this was a label added to their overly long name (against the will of Hitler, by the way) as an attempt at branching out to the left, following the example of similar nationalist neo-monarchist (preserve the 'king' but without heredity) parties in Austria. This policy didn't work as being a national socialist is an obvious contradiction (all socialists are internationalists and by nature for decentralisation of wealth and power), it would be like calling oneself a conservative libertarian (which is impossible as a fundamental to any libertarian program is progressive movement always towards further decentralization) or conservative anarchist." - me
You wrote that the NSDAP was "...largely composed of disafected and transplanted violent communists and socialists"
What the h#ll are you talking about the only people even remotely to the left were Ernst R. and Anton D. who were both summarily excised. Even their leftism, however, was further to the right of any communist or socialist from that time period.
Hitler infamously posited that the left was a Jewish conspiracy against Germany to take over the world and that the right needed to fight back.
What the h#ll kind of crack are you tools taking. Keep your damned hands off History!
In the future, instead of just looking like a fool try to read what was written on the board before you decide to contribute.
The police need to form special anti-thuggery squads . They also need to form civilian anti-thuggery groups among the immigrants, encouraging them to immediately report neo-Nazi presence and activity. Immigrant need to be encouraged to film (from a safe distance) the neo-Nazis when they are committing crimes.
Building this trust in the police will eventually result in a willingness to report terrorists and thugs of all kinds.