An unlikely German hero for the British press
German Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück has left ministers in London aghast with his undiplomatically forthright comments about the British stimulus package. Many British newspaper editors, however, are citing German prudence with approval.
Speaking to Newsweek, Steinbrück described Gordon Brown’s bid to borrow his way out of recession as ‘crass Keynesianism’. Mockingly, he pointed out that the cut in value added tax from 17.5 to 15 percent would leave a DVD player 80 pence cheaper – hardly enough to entice people to hit the malls.
Steinbrück’s comments were a blow for Brown and his chancellor (finance minister) Alistair Darling, providing as they did a pointed reminder of how much better prepared Germany is than Britain for the tough times ahead. Germany’s budget surplus contrasts with Britain’s large deficit; the high levels of personal debt in the UK contrast with low debt and high levels of savings in Germany.
Needless to say, today’s UK papers have been poring over the entrails of the Newsweek interview – before picking them up and slinging them at the British government.
The tabloid Sun newspaper, never a great friend of understatement, was quick to paraphrase the finance minister; ‘Germans: Gord is a total failure’, it shrieked.
Over at the centrist Independent, Jeremy Warner wondered whether the Steinbrück might like to take over his column: ‘In two words, he’s managed to articulate what many of us have been struggling to say ever since the [British] Government announced a £20bn VAT giveaway in the pre-Budget report – namely that trying to spend your way out of recession after years of preaching fiscal rectitude is not only a U-turn of quite astonishing proportions, but also that in the manner proposed it probably won’t do any good either.’
The right-wing populist Daily Mail agreed. It found itself in the unusual position of summoning the ghost of uptight sitcom hotelier Basil Fawlty to side with a German Social Democrat. In an article headlined ‘Don’t Mention the Fiscal Stimulus’, the paper admitted it wouldn’t usually take advice from Steinbrück, a man ‘known to frown on Anglo-Saxon free markets who earlier this year starred in a rap video wearing an Afro wig.’ But, it said, this time he was right:
All around the world, governments are rushing to spend and borrow their way out of the recession, despite no country in history ever managing to do this.
The Financial Times cautioned that the German finance minister may have spoken too soon. Reminding readers that Steinbrück is ‘not known for keeping his thoughts to himself,’ it describes his anger with Britain as ‘understandable, but misplaced’. Understandable, because Steinbrück has spent the past few years diligently bringing the German public finances back into the black. Misplaced because the economic downturn elsewhere is having a massive impact on German exporters. The time will come for Germany to lecture the rest of Europe on prudence, the paper says. For now, though, ‘Germany must start spending. The consequences otherwise will be dire.’
Other columnists were warning that it would be more correct to apply the ‘crass’ label to German policy. The economics editor of the Daily Telegraph, Edmund Conway, argued that German ‘inaction and restraint’ could have much worse consequences than the hyperactivity of the British.
During the 1930s it was the resistance of the world’s surplus nations to large-scale rescue packages that caused the economic misery to spread so virulently around the world.
Right or wrong, Steinbrück’s comments have done little to improve German-British relations. Still less have they sold German economic prudence to British ministers and their supporters in the press. But they have certainly given ammunition to Gordon Brown’s detractors.


































February 8th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
Perhaps Peer Steinbrück’s comments were not terribly diplomatic but the best friends are critical friends, not fair-weather friends. The majority of Seniors, age 50 or over, in the UK also believe that the temporary 2.5% cut in VAT was a waste of taxpayers’ money and has done nothing to stimulate the economy. The current discounts of 50-70% in many large stores have been much more effective in encouraging people to buy, and have cost the taxpayer nothing.
Seniors International and the Senior Citizens Party believe that a much more effective stimulus to the economy would have been to double the personal tax allowance which is currently very low at about £5,000 per year. After that everyone has to pay 20% tax. But the poverty level is £11,000 per year so we are taxing people who are below the poverty level, which does not make any sense at all. Even people who are on the minimum wage of £5 per hour will have reached this level after 6 months. We would be most interested to know how the German tax system deals with this situation ?
February 15th, 2009 at 12:11 am
I am sorry, but one socialist criticizing another on … not enough taxes? Sure 2% on CD or DVD is not a lot of money (I stopped buying these anyway, Netflix.com rocks IMHO). I believe that VAT should be dropped to 7%-9% on all products. This WOULD make a difference, this would really stimulate the economy. All of these “feel-good” for the public moves will not change much.
Will will then read on how free market doesn’t work…. Suuuuuure.
May 12th, 2009 at 7:23 am
“the high levels of personal debt in the UK contrast with low debt and high levels of savings in Germany.”
I must agree with the German policy. I did feel a bit strange in the beginning here, for example I felt like a little kid when I discovered it’s not me who decides when I pay the credit card debt back, but the bank automatically charges my account.
At first seemed strange, but then… why allow your citzens be ripped by Visa? Examples are numerous. One may normally laugh at it, but it is clearly a better option for hard times.
And SirNoBull, consumption does not improve economy, except for medical services.
October 30th, 2009 at 10:16 am
Michal Borsuk,
‘And SirNoBull, consumption does not improve economy, except for medical services.’
could you expand on these pearls of wisdom? because this sentence/argument/statement is exceedingly vague and a sounds just plain wrong.
Are you proposing the way we improve the economy is to stop buying anything, except medical services from the Govt.?
November 18th, 2009 at 8:47 pm
“All around the world, governments are rushing to spend and borrow their way out of the recession, despite no country in history ever managing to do this.”
It seemed to work for Germany in the thirties.
February 4th, 2010 at 4:52 pm
Taxes? SInce when is it the government’s right to constantly take? Please give me a break, what current EU governments do is no better than prince John and the sheriff, except they steal from all of us!